Wills Cont'd

AuthorKaren Nunez-Tesheira
Pages46-70
46 / Probate Practice and Procedure
REVOCATION OF WILLS
Statute prescribes the modes by which revocation of a will may be effected.
These are as follows:
by an attested document executed with the same formalities as
are needed for the making of a will;
by destruction;
by subsequent marriage;
by informal declaration;
by divorce or annulment.
A. Revocation by Attested Document1
All jurisdictions (save St Lucia)
According to the relevant statutory provisions of the various territories a
will may be revoked by another will or codicil or by some writing declaring
an intention to revoke the same and executed in the manner in which a
will is required to be executed. Revocation of a will can therefore be effected
not only by a later will or codicil but also by some writing which is neither
a will nor a codicil but which is executed in the same manner as a will.
St Lucia
Art 828 (1) and (2) Civil Code Ch. 242 is of the same practical effect.2Art
828 provides that wills cannot be revoked by the testator except:
by means of a subsequent will revoking them either expressly or
by the nature of his disposition; or
by means of a notarial or other written act, by which a change of
intention is expressly stated.
2
Wills cont’d.
Revocation, Alteration, Rectification,
Republication, Revival of Wills
Wills cont’d. / 47
Intention to Revoke
All Jurisdictions
However whether the will is revoked by another will, a codicil or some
other document, there must be the intention to revoke — what is otherwise
called animus revocandi. This intention may be expressed or implied:
(i) Express Revocation: An express revocation arises where a latter will
contains a revocation clause—a clause which is usually inserted at
the beginning of a will stating that the testator revokes all former
will. It usually reads as follows:
I hereby revoke all former wills and testamentary dispositions made by me and
declare this to be my last will and testament.
Where there is a revocation clause in a will or codicil there is a
presumption that the testator intended to revoke his earlier will or
wills. This presumption is rebuttable by evidence of a contrary
intention but the onus of proof which is required to displace this
presumption is heavy.3Although strong, the presumption can
nevertheless be rebutted in the following cases:
where a contrary intention can be proved or shown;4
where the revocation clause was inserted in the will by mistake.5
where the doctrine of conditional revocation or dependent relative
revocation applies.6
(ii) Implied Revocation:7Implied revocation arises where a later will or
codicil contains no revocation clause but its provisions are
inconsistent with an earlier will or codicil. In such cases, the earlier
will or codicil is impliedly revoked by the later will or codicil, in so
far as the latter contains provisions inconsistent with the former. An
earlier will can be totally or partially revoked by implication. If the
provisions of the later will are wholly inconsistent or repetitive, i.e.
it deals with all the areas or matters dealt with in the earlier will, the
earlier will is completely revoked, and only the later will will be
admitted to probate. If on the other hand, some, but not all the
provisions of the later will, are inconsistent with an earlier will, both
or all of the testamentary documents will be admitted to probate, as
together constituting the last will of the testator.8 As was observed
in Townsend v. Moore,9a person can die with only one will and in
cases where there is partial revocation of an earlier will, all the

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT