The 1989-1993 Administration

AuthorTrevor Munroe/Arnold Bertram
ProfessionRhodes Scholar and Fulbright Fellow, political scientist, labour activist and politician, is Professor of Government and Politics at the University of the West Indies, Mona/Distinguished commentator on Jamaican Social History and Political Development is a former Legislator in both houses of the Jamaican Parliament and a former Minister of ...
Pages544-589
544 / Post-Independence Administrations
The 1989 Elections: Background and Results
The PNP boycott of the 1983 elections left the JLP with a monopoly
of parliamentary power. While it had been a clever political
manoeuvre, it hardly made the JLP any more popular, and actually
created some sympathy for Manley from an electorate which shared his
views on the importance of electoral reform. The JLP therefore started
its second term with victory in a snap election, the holding of which was
opposed by 77 per cent of the electorate.
As early as the elections of 1980, there had been a considerable
reduction in party loyalty among voters. Polls done subsequently by
Carl Stone showed that ‘loyal party voting had drastically declined, from
87 per cent in the early 1970s to 48 per cent by 1986. On the other hand,
the level of voters who make choices on the basis of issues had grown
from 13 per cent in 1971 to 52 per cent in 1986.’1
The first challenge to the JLP’s claim of a superior economic
performance came in the form of the general strike of 1985. By then
with the manufacturing sector unable to compete against cheap imports,
the layoffs had begun in the factories. This was followed by even more
extensive layoffs of bauxite workers with the cut-back in alumina
production. In spite of massive external borrowing foreign exchange
supplies declined to precarious levels. Not even the Caribbean Basin
Initiative developed by US President Reagan seemed able to jump-start
the export-led economic recovery programme. The general strike lasted
The 1989–1993 Administration
Chapter 13
The 1989–1993 Administration / 545
for one week and once it petered out widespread dismissals followed,
and demoralization within the labour movement set in.
With the constant pressure from the PNP for fresh elections, the
first opportunity for the electorate to express their verdict on the JLP
came with the 1986 Local Government Elections. At this time, although
the economy was on a growth path with an upturn in investment and
production, the PNP scored a resounding victory in what many pundits
described as a mini general election.
In the second highest turnout in local government elections, some
66 per cent of the electorate turned out to hand the JLP a decisive defeat
in every parish excepting St. Thomas and Clarendon. In the aftermath
of the election, Seaga blamed the defeat on the inability of his
parliamentary colleagues to bring out JLP voters, insisting that it was
in no way a rejection of his policies. In direct contradiction to Mr Seaga’s
views, the Stone polls found that, ‘Hard times, disregard for the poor,
Mr. Seaga’s unpopularity, poor MP representation, unfulfilled promises,
declining social services, the desire for a change of government, and the
tax on savings are among the major reasons advanced by citizens for the
JLP defeat.’ 2
Despite the election setback JLP economic policies under Seaga
continued to produce robust growth right up to the elections of 1989.
With the launch of the Social Well-Being Programme in 1988, the JLP
confidently carried its message to the electorate — that the austerity
burden of the early years was now over, the adjustments to the economy
had been made successfully and the people could now look forward to
enjoying the fruits of their sacrifices. Despite the improvement in the
economy, ‘production levels in 1987 were still below real output in the
economy over all the years between 1970 and 1976’.3
The other factor that Seaga seemed to have underestimated was the
fallout with organized labour following the general strike of 1985 and,
even with the improvements of the economy, he never seemed to enjoy
the confidence and trust of the labour movement.
Just before the elections came Hurricane Gilbert, which brought
massive damage islandwide. Given the level of devastation, voters once
again saw the alliance between the United States and Seaga as their best
546 / Post-Independence Administrations
bet for handouts to assist their efforts at recovery. Substantial aid did
arrive, but, from the standpoint of Seaga and the JLP, it was not clear
whether the process of distribution was helpful to their election campaign.
On November 6, 1986, Manley wrote to Seaga proposing a bi-
partisan approach to crime and violence. This was followed by a second
letter in October of 1987, after which, extensive talks between both
parties led to the Peace Accord. This Accord, which came after extensive
discussions between both parties, was a sincere effort to prevent the
country ever experiencing the mayhem of 1980 again.
Cynics interpreted the success of the Peace Accord as being due to
the fact that the major purveyors of partisan political violence had by then
left politics for the more lucrative trade in drugs. They were now busy
claiming their share of the growing trade in cocaine between Columbia
and the United States, which used Jamaica as a transshipment port.
The trade in hard drugs provided the ‘dons’ with an independent
source of income amounting to millions of US dollars. This income was
used to finance the network of criminal terrorism, and to bribe officials
of the state, enabling the don to perform the roles of benefactor and
protector more effectively than the elected politician. This independent
source of finance altered forever the relationship between the don and
the politician. In the new relationship, the politician was becoming more
of a facilitator and a public relations consultant, as both exchanged
services as equals around the table.
The extent of the involvement of former political activists from
Jamaica in the drug trade was revealed in October 1987, when the US
Bureau of Alcohol, Firearms and Tobacco (BAFT) launched a nation-
wide series of raids on Jamaican ‘posses’ in North America, which were
then linked to 625 drug related murders.
The demise of the Workers’ Party of Jamaica (WPJ) before the
elections of 1989, and with it the decline of the Left movement in Jamaica,
needs to be more fully documented and studied. It was in the election of
1980 that the WPJ came face to face with the realities. Confident of a
PNP victory and the growth of more radical Left tendencies evident in
1976, they had expectations of progress and expansion. Hence Seaga’s
overwhelming victory shook their self-confidence. Their participation

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT