The 1976-1980 Administration

AuthorTrevor Munroe/Arnold Bertram
ProfessionRhodes Scholar and Fulbright Fellow, political scientist, labour activist and politician, is Professor of Government and Politics at the University of the West Indies, Mona/Distinguished commentator on Jamaican Social History and Political Development is a former Legislator in both houses of the Jamaican Parliament and a former Minister of ...
Pages421-467
The 1976–1980 Administration / 421
The 1976 Elections: Background and Results
Despite the impressive record of economic growth recorded by the
Shearer administration between 1967 and 1972, Michael Manley
defeated him by a landslide in the 1972 general elections, capturing 56
per cent of the popular vote, the largest majority recorded up to then.
This defeat has often been used to question the judgment of the Jamaican
masses that comprise the majority of the electorate. How could voters,
after a period of record economic growth, endorse the slogan ‘time for a
change’ and vote out the incumbent administration?
Very often, the experience of the Jamaican masses is that spectacular
economic growth translates into super-profits for the racial minorities
who own the economy, and depressed wages for the black majority who
provide labour. During Shearer’s term of office, very little of the super-
profits trickled down to the working people, and unemployment
increased. Worse, the resurgence of ‘Black Nationalism’ found Shearer
on the side of the establishment.
To Shearer’s credit, the National Insurance Scheme (NIS) was a
major piece of worker legislation. However, it was hardly enough to
change popular perception that the first black man to occupy this exalted
position had been less than sensitive to the aspirations of his race.
Consequently, a large part of the electorate, when offered the choice,
opted for a leader who, in their view, would use the power of the state to
intervene on their behalf in the fight for improved wages and a better
The 1976–1980 Administration
Chapter 10
422 / Post-Independence Administrations
quality of life. In Michael Manley, they found not only a champion for
workers’ rights, but also a passionate advocate for social justice and for
an end to racial oppression.
Economic growth is a precondition for the development of the
country, and all sectors must be educated around this reality. Prudent
fiscal management and an investor friendly environment cannot be traded
off in the fight for equity. But as long as ownership of the economy
remains exclusively in the hands of racial minorities, it will be difficult
to convince the dispossessed that their interests are also served in a
growing economy.
The PNP victory of 1972 under the leadership of Michael Manley
was perhaps the most complete expression of national consensus and
convergence around his articulation of a programme of social justice.
For the first time, the PNP enjoyed simultaneously the overwhelming
electoral support of big business, manual wage labour, white-collar
workers and the unemployed, as a record breaking 56 per cent of the
electorate voted for Michael Manley’s promise of change.
The populist phase of the Michael Manley regime lasted until the
declaration of Democratic Socialism in October 1974, which formalized
the incorporation of the radical intelligentsia as an integral part of the
administration in which Michael Manley himself articulated the need
for radical change. By the time of the socialist declaration, D.K. Duncan
had assumed the position of General Secretary of the Party, and former
Abeng activists Arnold Bertram and Paul Miller had been given seats in
the Senate, and assigned as Parliamentary Secretaries in the Office of
the Prime Minister and the Ministry of Youth and Community
Development respectively.
Simultaneously, the People’s National Party Youth Organization
(PNPYO), under Paul Burke and Sheldon McDonald, began recruiting
to its ranks young people with progressive ideas and an appetite for
political work. Up to that point, women had played outstanding individual
roles in the political process. Beverley Manley would be the first to
consciously organize women as a collective force to influence political
decision making.
The 1976–1980 Administration / 423
Major programmes of social transformation had been introduced,
including a national literacy campaign and land reform, and the
possibilities for class collaboration and social peace seemed endless. Those
who opposed Manley’s socialist stance held the view that had he not
introduced the rhetoric of socialism, the regime would have been spared
the migration of its entrepreneurial class and the economic sabotage
which followed.
It was also a period in which US imperialism was being viewed as
the major obstacle to international peace and development. The war in
Vietnam was becoming increasingly unpopular, and in Latin America,
the United States involvement in the overthrow of the democratically
elected government of Allende in Chile, and the continuing isolation of
Cuba only served to strengthen anti-US feeling in the region. The decision
of the Soviet Union to exploit the situation by extending its influence in
Latin America and Africa served to heighten tensions and escalate the
Cold War. It was with the appointment of Kissinger as Secretary of
State, that the United States began to reassert its hegemony and contain
Soviet ideological penetration.
This was the context in which Michael Manley imposed a levy on
the foreign-owned bauxite companies and expanded the role of the State
in the economy. Jamaica had ‘moved from a pro-Western, free market
economy, with a liberal government ideology, to a non-alignment, state
interventionist market economy and an official socialist non-Marxist
ideology’. 1
Relations between the Manley government and the US
administration of President Ford cooled considerably between 1974 and
1976, as Jamaica expanded its relations with Cuba, and Manley himself
took on a leading role in the non-aligned movement and the struggle
against US imperialism in Africa. As the Jamaica–Cuba links increased
over the period, the JLP, the local and the North American mass media,
the local business class in both the merchant and manufacturing sectors,
and a vocal minority among the professional middle class, orchestrated
a propaganda campaign accusing the government of communist
tendencies and directions.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT