Regulation of International Financial Services in the Caribbean

AuthorBruce Zagaris
Pages179-229
179
Regulation of International Financial Services in the Caribbean
15
Regulation of International Financial Services
in the Caribbean
Bruce Zagaris
This paper reviews the regulation of international financial services in the
Caribbean.
I. Introduction
THE ISSUE OF regulating international financial services depends partly on
one’s perspective. Law enforcement officials and international regulatory
officials are intent on preventing and combatting financial crime, such as
fraud, money laundering, business failures; and helping the millions of victims
of such crimes who often need the assistance of states and/or their societies.
Consumers of international financial services are looking for more flexible
regulation, generally lower taxation, financial confidentiality, lower
administrative burdens, less bureaucracy, and the ability to minimize
administrative costs and time to comply with financial regulation.
The countries that are hosting international financial services need to
strike a balance. They need enough flexibility, low taxation, confidentiality,
and flexible regulation to attract investment in financial services. They also
need sufficient financial supervision and regulation so that the financial service
providers are vetted, supervised, and regulated sufficiently to provide consumers
with the confidence to invest. Quality supervision over time will also provide
a perception of stability for potential investors. Sometimes small governments
that initiate an international financial services programme tend to change
regulatory policies significantly from year to year as their administrations
and regulators change.
This paper reviews threats and responses to the sector, the development
of Financial Services Commissions and international regimes for preventing
and combatting international financial crimes and regulatory supervision.
The implications of expanded exchange of information among financial
LEGAL ISSUES IN OFFSHORE FINANCIAL SERVICES
180
supervisory agencies, international tax enforcement, and financial fraud
enforcement are considered. Thereafter, the paper discusses regulation of
specific products and entities, such as offshore banks, companies and related
commercial entities, international trusts, companies and trust service providers,
and insurance. The paper then discusses strategies for integrating an anti-
laundering prevention plan with a financial services policy for the Caribbean
and small offshore jurisdictions. Finally, prevention planning and due diligence
are considered as essential elements of financial service regulation.
II. Threats and Responses
A. Transparency and Accountability
One problem in the regulation of international financial services arises from
lack of transparency and accountability. The definition of transparency is
that investors can access the laws and regulations and ascertain their operation
quickly and with a minimum of cost. Investors, foreign regulatory officials,
officials of international organisations, and the public as a whole in the host
country must have easy access to the rules, procedures, and statistics generally
governing the sector and the products within the sector.
Accountability means that the regulatory authorities produce statistics at
least annually which show the usage of the sector generally, the individual
products, the government revenue from various types of fees and taxes, the
distribution of such fees and taxes, and macroeconomic linkages from the
sector and various products. Accountability enables persons concerned to know
that the regulation is efficient, honest, and operating according to plans.
Inevitably, accountability may raise questions and enables the government
and/or parties to press for changes in the operation of the sector or parts of it.
Accountability can also serve as an instrument to show the public that the
sector and/or parts of it are worthwhile and yielding the results promised in
the legislation.
B. Products
The type of financial regulation varies with the products in the international
financial sector and country. Some products, such as offshore banks and mutual
funds, require a more intensive and specialised regulatory regime than
international business companies (IBCs). Sometimes, investors and consumers
can achieve similar goals through alternative products. Hence, uneven
regulation among products will result in skewed investment patterns. For
instance, a pattern in anti-money laundering has been that, as governments
181
Regulation of International Financial Services in the Caribbean
intensively applied anti-money laundering regulations to banks, launderers
and criminals resorted to non-bank financial institutions (for example, money
transmitters) and vehicles (for example, jewellery companies, car dealerships,
and real estate). Another example is that, depending on incentives and
regulatory regimes applicable to different business entities, investors may
decide to invest in IBCs, limited liability companies (also known as societies
with restricted liability), cell companies, limited partnerships, or trusts.
C. Licensing
A government can solve many of the regulatory problems by addressing the
risks through licensing. If a regulatory agency properly vets applicants through
obtaining enough information about applicants, verifying the information
both by investigating the references and by independent checks, they should
be able to avoid many of the future problems, costs, and potentially adverse
information that spring from problem service providers. A regulatory authority
should design forms that obtain the information required. If necessary, it should
require that the applicant enable it to spend the time and money to verify all
the information relevant to the application.
Regulatory authorities must establish minimum standards that prospective
applicants should fulfil prior to the issuance of a license. The standards must
be clear, objective and readily available to the general public, thereby fulfilling
the transparency standards mentioned above.
The licensing process should be independent and sufficient to be able to
assess ownership, structure, directors and senior management, operational
plan and internal controls, the capital base, and projected financial condition.1
The Caribbean Financial Action Task Force has reported problems with
due diligence.
For instance, an Eastern Caribbean official confirmed that it does not
supervise the offshore sector, but it does conduct due diligence in licensing
investigations on behalf of its member states. The same official has advised
that Russian nationals have shown considerable interest in establishing banking
institutions in the region. However, when assistance is sought for background
checks from developed countries, such information is not obtained easily.
When it is obtained, the information lacks sufficient specificity.
A very low volume of exchange of information exists between officials of
Caribbean jurisdictions, but higher levels between the region and metropolitan
centers of the developed countries.2

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT