Introduction

AuthorAmbassador Cedric Joseph
Pages9-35
ix
Introduction
INTRODUCTION
One feature of this post-Cold War period is that the dissolution of the
Soviet Empire has released a new wave of nationalism and particularist
sentiment that had been previously suppressed. It is evident not only in the
Balkans where its intensity has been the most trenchant but also in other
areas of the global community. The change, which seems to be still unfolding,
has been critical to the existing system of nation states in that conflicts,
armed and otherwise, take place less between states than within states or the
community of member states. Change has fed on the existing disparities,
inequalities and the widening gulf within societies and on renewed aspirations
to confront the status quo. In association with the structural transformation
in the global trading regimes, inspired by like projections and dominance of
particular interests, a disruptive period has been taking form that will demand
the closest attention from our small societies.
Change has been constant in Caribbean society; for it has not differed
elsewhere. Transition connotes change; and change, even when things appear
to remain the same, foments conflict. And conflict is rarely far off in the
horizon. In this first decade of the new century, the Caribbean Community is
obliged to look as seriously and soberly to its future as it has done when it
took steps to consolidate further the integration movement.
As the Community secures a single market and economy, it has to grapple
with the erosion, really the beginning of the end, of the preferential
arrangements that had their roots in the colonial connection. It has to continue
to strive imaginatively for a future for its “sensitive” and pivotal banana
exports. And in the case of the historic ties to sugar, some members have
already taken the bold decision to abandon future production; a few, the
xINTERVENTION, BORDER AND MARITIME ISSUES IN CARICOM
even more daring venture to continue production in a highly uneven and
competitive market.
Moreover, while the region negotiates a new Economic Partnership
Agreement with Europe, it has to cope with an expanded Europe, the eastern
half of which, apart from being somewhat disdainful of the survivals of
imperial trading, is a major competitor for investments and aid programmes.
Of the identifying features of the period, of signal concern to the region
should be the incidence of intra-state conflict. As CARICOM society advances
beyond the first generation of political independence, the contest for political
power in small electorates where a paucity of votes can confine a grouping
to opposition, provides the environment for internal disruption and adverse
impact on the Community at large. In the multiethnic societies, the realities
of exclusion contest vigorously the declarations about inclusion. When joined
with other sources of conflict, the ability of member states to maintain peace,
stability and security in their respective territory, stretches the resilience of
the entire Community to the limit.
This collection of papers, therefore, deals with a set of issues relating to
conflicts which have emerged from domestic political crises and from the
process of delimiting land and maritime borders; both Community and
neighbouring states being involved. The conflicts between member states
over land or maritime borders are especially dangerous to existing cordial
bilateral relations, and to the Community generally, in their accentuation of
the interests of individual states. The conflicts over the land borders have
their roots in the colonial inheritance and were passed on unresolved to the
independent states. Other conflicts have inhered in the small political
framework, some from multiethnic structures that are also the result of colonial
policy, where a fractional difference in electoral support can confine a group,
sometimes an ethnic grouping, to the opposition for any length of time.
Those conflicts relating to the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ) are of recent
vintage.
When the issues implode into conflict they have a potential to be disruptive
and have taxed the energies and expertise of the political leadership in the
search for resolution. Molding and consolidating units into a single integrated
space may not take place without discord. Striking a harmonious balance
with the self-interests of individual states, therefore, becomes a supreme effort
that takes time. Yet, it has to be done if the Community is to progress. The
European Union is being constructed against a turbulent history of dynastic
rivalries, large-scale armed hostilities among some of its member states,

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT