Thomas v Arscott
| Jurisdiction | Jamaica |
| Court | Unspecified Court (Jamaica) |
| Year | 1986 |
| Date | 1986 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 cases
-
Williams (Marvette) (an infant suing by next friend and mother Marvalee Williams) and Marvalee Williams v Gladstone Williams and Erick Williams
...in the sum of $10,0000 was exhibited for medical expenses (since 28 th March, 2001 to date). 30 Applying the principles enunciated in Thomas v. Arscott (1986) 23 JLR 144, this court cannot award a greater sum than $5,700.00 unless there was an amendment to the pleadings to reflect the incre......
-
Mills (David) v Smith & Stewart Mobile Corporation Ltd and Patrick Leslie
...only gave advanced notice that the sum claimed was not final. Applying the principles set out in the Court of Appeal decision of Thomas v Arscott (1986) 23 JLR 144 this Court cannot award a greater sum than $65,000 unless there was an amendment to the pleadings to reflect the increased amou......
-
Hunter, Winnifred v Michael Brown
...to see if the plaintiff can recover loss of earnings up to the assessment it is necessary to examine the Court of Appeal's decision in Thomas v Arscott (1986) 23 J.L.R 144. In that case the plaintiff phrased his claim for loss of earnings in this way: "Loss of earnings from the 18/11/82 to ......
-
DeSouza, Donovan v CB Duncan & Associates Ltd et Al
...the particulars of claim to bring it in harmony with the evidence concerning the Canadian farm work programme (see Rowe P in Michael Thomas v James Arscott (1986) 23 J.L.R. 144, 151B–152B ). It is not possible to argue that the amendment covered both careers. The evidence is too plain that ......
Get Started for Free