The Economic Management of Small Island Developing Countries

AuthorCourtney Blackman
Pages49-65
SMALL ISLAND DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
49
A hazard of high office in small island developing countries (IDCs)
is exposure to unsolicited and patronizing advice of visitors from
big countries, especially officials from international financial
institutions like the IMF and World Bank. Such advice usually
reflects the prevailing economic fad in the major industrial nations
that determine IMF/World Bank ideology. This year the panacea
is privatization; a little earlier it was positive real interest rates;
before that it was currency devaluation. Completing the cycle
during the Carter administration was the establishment of public
investment units.
A common feature of this advice is failure to take into account
the characteristics of small island states. Indeed, a visiting economist
once suggested to me that there were no fundamental differences
between the economies of Barbados and Brazil! Intuitively, there
must be something wrong with this approach. After all, a separate
discipline of paediatrics has evolved in medicine for the treatment
of the young; children are not regarded simply as small-scale
versions of adults.
My topic derives from a consulting assignment which I carried
out a few years ago for the Caribbean Community (CARICOM). I
was asked to prepare a position paper justifying special financial
aid from donor countries to island developing countries (IDCs). I
am not sure how convincing was my advocacy. For one thing, IDCs
3
THE ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT
OF SMALL ISLAND
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
THE PRACTICE OF ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT
50
already receive a disproportionately high level of concessional aid.
In 1982 the unweighted average of concessional assistance to IDCs,
on a per capita basis, was US$428 (US$510 for small IDCs) as
compared with US$14 for all developing countries. Besides, small
IDCs are among the most successful countries in the world. For
example, the per capita income for Iceland in 1989 was
US$21,070, US$10,450 for Singapore, US$11,320 for The
Bahamas and US$6,350 for my native Barbados, placing them in
the World Bank category of high income countries.
Our purpose is to identify those characteristics that
differentiate small island states from major industrial states, and
to develop principles of economic management for small island
states as a group. Our first task will be to define the special features
of insularity, especially in respect of small states. Secondly, we shall
explore the economics of small IDCs. This exercise should enable
us to construct a decision model appropriate for the economic
management of IDCs, and to deduce principles of economic
management relevant to small IDC, such as those in the Caribbean.
Features of Small Island Developing Countries
Francois Doumenge, who prepared the UNCTAD paper,
Viability of Small Island States, provides the most erudite definition
of insularity:
True insularity only exists where (the emerged land area) is entirely
exposed to the influence of the sea. “True” islands are primarily
areas of land which have emerged at a sufficient distance from the
continent to escape direct influence, in terms of physical, as well as
human and economic factors.l
IDCs include independent members of the United Nations
as well as island territories, some of them colonies like St. Helena,
others self-governing dependencies like Montserrat, and others
like Martinique and San Andres, which are integral parts of a

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT