R v Muir (Henzel)
| Jurisdiction | Jamaica |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Jamaica) |
| Year | 1995 |
| Date | 1995 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
11 cases
-
Delano Smith Appellant v R Respondent [ECSC]
...as an alternative verdict, there was no error of law on the part of the learned judge. Mancini v DPP [1992] AC 1 applied and R v Muir [1995] 48 WIR 262 followed. 3. It was open to the jury to find from the evidence that it was the appellant who had stabbed the deceased. The inference conte......
-
Garnett Edwards v R
...and reasonable inferences which can be drawn from the proved facts. Counsel relied on the following cases for these statements of the law: ( R v Muir (1995) 48 WIR 262, R v Porrit [1961] 3 All ER 463, R v Bonnick (1977) 66 Cr App R 266, Hyman v DPP [1974] 2 All ER 41 ). 49 Counsel submitted......
-
R v Hugh Anderson
...consideration of the jury any defence that fairly arises on the evidence irrespective of whether or not the accused is relying on it. In R. v. Muir [1995] 48 WIR 262, Patterson, J.A. (relying on R. v Bonnick [1977] 66 Cr. App. R 266 ) at page 265, said: "It is undoubtedly the duty of a ju......
-
R v Gordon (Everton) and Holder (Paul)
...a duty to leave for the consideration of the jury every issue fairly arising on the evidence although the defence is not relying on it: ( R v Muir (1995) 48 W.I.R. 262 following R V Bonnick [1978] 66 Cr. App. R. 266 ). If therefore there is insufficient evidence of provoking conduct to cau......
Get Started for Free