R v McDonald
| Jurisdiction | Jamaica |
| Year | 1965 |
| Date | 1965 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Jamaica) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Malcolm Maduro Appellant v The Queen Respondent
...relation to the police interview as the judge's directions on the burden and standard of proof would have achieved the same effect. R v McDonald (1965) 8 WIR 388 applied. (8) The judge did not err in failing to give a specific burden of proof direction in relation to a statement of the D......
-
Malcolm Maduro Appellant v The Queen Respondent
...relation to the police interview as the judge's directions on the burden and standard of proof would have achieved the same effect. R v McDonald (1965) 8 WIR 388 applied. (8) The judge did not err in failing to give a specific burden of proof direction in relation to a statement of the D......
-
The Queen v Willis Todman
...Council found that the judge was wrong to have ruled that there was no case but should have left the issues for the jury. 28 The case of R. v. McDonald8 WIR 388 quoted by Counsel for the Crown is not a case on ‘no case submissions.’ In that case it was emphasized that if two reasonable infe......
-
Maduro v The Queen
...in relation to the police interview as the judge's directions on the burden and standard of proof would have achieved the same effect. R v. McDonald (1965) 8 W.I.R. 388 applied. (8) The judge did not err in failing to give a specific burden of proof direction in relation to a statement of t......
Request a trial to view additional results