Electoral Outcomes and Party Fortunes, 1992?2005

AuthorCynthia Barrow-Giles
Pages53-127
Electoral Outcomes and Party Fortunes 53
The Leeward Islands:
Analysis of Data — Consistency and Change
Anguilla
For as long as Anguilla remained a part of St. Kitts-Nevis-Anguilla,
the existing political environment remained hostile to the
development of indigenous political parties. While political parties
evolved in all the English-speaking Caribbean countries by the 1950s,
it was not until the so-called post-revolutionary period in Anguilla
that local political parties emerged. It was therefore not until the
unilateral termination of the political and constitutional authority of
St. Kitts in 1967, that the opportunity arose for the development of
political parties on the island. Colville Petty argued that it was in the
wake of the expulsion of the administrative presence of St. Kitts on the
island that the fillip for the development of local political parties
emerged.1
It was in that context that one faction of the essentially anti-St.
Kitts protest movement took the decision to transform the movement
into a political party. While the movement itself was divided on the
direction that Anguilla should take in terms of party politics and
organization, nonetheless, by October 1967, the Anguilla Democratic
Party (ADP) was formed. The launch of that party; the island’s first
indigenous political party was however, not well received on the island
and in the face of hostile opposition, the party quickly dissolved. Petty
ELECTORAL OUTCOMES AND PARTY
FORTUNES, 1992–2005
CHAPTER 3
54 General Elections and Voting
contends that ‘Anguillas first indigenous political party had a very
short life and the factors surrounding its birth and death were the
consequences of lack of political experience’.2
Beyond the issue of political inexperience, early political parties
in Anguilla could not flourish due to dominant personalities in that
county and the resulting tradition of individual independence from
party loyalty. The culture of independence itself was no doubt
engendered by the failure of political parties to take root in the country
in the mid-twentieth century, stemming partly from the political
domination of St. Kitts. 3
It was not until two years later, in the wake of the establishment
of direct British control, that another attempt was made to organize a
political party. Petty attributes this to ‘the climate for the polarization
of political forces on the island’ occasioned by British occupation and
the growing opposition to what was perceived in some quarters as
dictatorial tendencies on the part of Ronald Webster.4 Beyond these
two factors, the possibility of power transferring to the local population
at some undetermined time under The Anguilla (Administration)
Order of 1971, provided yet another impetus for the development of
political parties on the island. Led by Atlin Harringan, the Anguilla
Constructive Democratic Movement (ACDM) was formed.
Challenged by the leadership of the ACDM and in direct response
to the changing political circumstances on the island, Ronald Webster,
not to be outdone by his political detractors, organized the People’s
Progressive Party (PPP). However, like its predecessor, the ADP, the
ACDM lacked mass appeal and quickly disappeared.
The PPP was therefore the first political party in Anguilla to
formally contest a general election on the island. Led by Ronald
Webster, the party won six of the seven council seats with the remaining
seat successfully contested by independent candidate Emile Gumbs,
a founding member of the ACDM.
It was not until 1976 with the passing of The Anguilla
(Constitution) Order of 1976, which provided for the establishment
of a ministerial system of government, that the foundations for the
development of party politics were firmly laid.5Though the act itself
provided for the possibility for the development of additional political
Electoral Outcomes and Party Fortunes 55
parties in the country, this proved extremely difficult. Several political
parties were formed during the period 1972 and 1980 when a local
political party contested the first elections. While many of them were
unable to survive beyond a few short months, the organization of a
second political party on the island, laid the basis for competitive
party politics. Notable among these early political parties were the
Anguilla Democratic Party (ADP), led by Camile Connor in 1976,
the Anguilla National Alliance (ANA) formed in 1980, and the Anguilla
United Movement (AUM). Therefore until 1980 Anguilla lacked all
criteria of conforming to a competitive party system. 6
The post-1976 general elections in Anguilla proved to be interesting
and provided the cauldron for the development of new political parties
in the country. Much of that can be attributed to the continued
resentment of Ronald Webster’s leadership style. While the PPP with
Webster at its helm won the 1976 general elections, taking six of the
contested seven constituencies, internal opposition to his leadership soon
emerged in Parliament. Three years after a very successful election
campaign, Ronald Webster confronted a major crisis when a successful
no confidence motion was moved against him as a result of his refusal to
support the resolution of a land dispute.7The sole independent member
of parliament, Hubert Hughes, sponsored the no confidence motion
against the Chief Minister and was given crucial support by several
members of Webster’s ruling PPP. Webster was therefore removed as
Chief Minister of Anguilla. While the government was able to survive
the coup with Emile Gumbs as Chief Minister, the revolt against Webster
nonetheless contributed to the demise of the PPP. In any event two new
political parties were formed in time for the 1980 general elections.
By 1980 two new political parties emerged on the political scene.
In early 1980 Ronald Webster formed the AUM with his former
political rivals, Ronald Hughes and Colonel Claudius Roberts, as co-
founders.8The breakaway faction of the PPP formed the ANA. These
two parties contested the 1980 general elections. As table 3:1 shows
the outcome of that election was a stunning blow for the ANA and a
resounding victory for Ronald Webster’s AUM. Having secured six of
the seven parliamentary seats, with the ANA winning only one seat,
the AUM was unable to maintain its hold on political power. That

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT