CARICOM and the Current Challenges of Multilateral Trade Negotiations

AuthorJessica Byron, UWI, Jamaica
Pages65-87
65
Caricom and the Current Challenges of Multilateral Trade Negotiations
This article was originally prepared for the special Tenth Anniversary
issue of the Revista Venezolana de Ciencias Sociales which features
the Caribbean Basin, and is published in that September 2004 issue
as “La Comunidad del Caribe Frente a los Procesos del ALCA y de
la UE.” I am grateful to the editors of the Revista who have allowed
me to publish it here in English.
Introduction
Trade agreements are a prism through which to view the problems
that have engaged us for so many decades...” (M. Bray, Latin
American Perspectives, 31, 1, 2004, p. 28).
In Caribbean debates on the nature of globalization, some voices have
argued that the region is no stranger to this process, since Caribbean societies
are themselves the products of an early form of globalized movement of
goods and peoples that began in the 1500s (Klak, 1998, 6; Thomas in Benn
and Hall, 2000a, 8). However, analysts have also pointed out that the
globalization of the 1980s and beyond is an unprecedented process which is
reconfiguring the organization of our societies and the ways in which we are
linked to the rest of the world economy (Thomas in Benn and Hall, 2000a, 9;
Bernal in Benn and Hall, 2000b, 295). The present article reflects that second
point of view. It examines the major changes that have been underway since
the early 1990s in the political and economic relations between the CARICOM
countries and Europe, and CARICOM and the rest of the Western Hemisphere.
CARICOM AND THE CURRENT
CHALLENGES OF MULTILATERAL
TRADE NEGOTIATIONS
Jessica Byron
University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica
33
33
3
66 CARICOM: Appropriate Adaptation to a Changing Global Environment
It identifies the advent of a toughened world trade regime under the auspices
of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the reshaping of the political
architecture in Europe and the Americas as the two critical factors driving
this process of change.
During the early 1990s, CARICOM began a major restructuring, designed
to establish a single market and economy (CSME) among its member states.
It was felt that this was one way of counteracting the economic and political
marginalization that the small countries feared in the onslaught of
globalization and the aftermath of Cold War politics. Some countries, notably
Trinidad & Tobago and Barbados, also embarked on domestic structural
adjustment processes in a bid to increase the competitiveness of their
economies. In general, CARICOM countries adopted a defensive posture
towards the rapidly changing global political economy, viewing it with
apprehension, feeling that their options vis-à-vis a harsh external environment
were dwindling. They were particularly concerned by the steady phasing out
of developmentalist principles fought for during the North-South economic
negotiations of the 1960s and 1970s, such as non-reciprocal preferential
market access and concessionary capital flows for developing countries. In
this new era, developing countries were re-categorized as Least Developed
Countries (LLDCs) which would still have access to such facilities, and Middle
Income Developing Countries, like most CARICOM states, which would be
gradually subjected to the rules of a liberalized global economy. Part of their
restructuring exercise involved establishing new mechanisms for diplomatic
coordination to manage the plethora of trade negotiations that were looming
in the GATT/WTO, with the European Union in the context of EU-ACP
relations and within the Western Hemisphere. The new multilateralism of
the 1990s placed a heavy burden of representation and participation on small,
developing countries and closer regional cooperation was the main way they
envisaged they could meet this challenge.
It is evident, therefore, that globalization has been a powerful catalyst
for domestic and regional restructuring, for the participation of non-state
actors in the trade policy process, and for the re-designing of the regimes that
govern the trade relations among CARICOM countries themselves and
between themselves and other actors. This article first examines the negotiating
and trade environment for the CARICOM countries since 1994 and their
institutional responses to the challenges. We then discuss the changing
kaleidoscope of relations between the European Union (EU) and the African-
Caribbean-Pacific (ACP) group of countries which has engendered the Cotonou
Treaty, signed in Benin in June 2000. Finally, we analyze the Caribbean role

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT